Sample of your PDF report

Facemap

Cover

FacemapAesthetic Intelligence

Personal facial geometry report

83

Attractiveness Score, 1 to 100

Landmarks

478

Measurements

22

Face shape

Heart

Precision Aesthetic Intelligence

01 / 9

Facemap

01. Your Attractiveness Score

Attractiveness Score 83/100

Your score comes from 478 mapped facial landmarks turned into 22 measurement categories. Every reading is corrected for head angle and expression, weighted by how reliable it is on your photo, then mapped onto a 1 to 100 scale by a model calibrated against a published research set of more than Facemap scans.

Calculationcorrected, confidence-weighted readings, mapped through the published reference ranges
Reference curvescore = round( 100 x exp( -0.5 x ( (reading - target) / tolerance )^2 ) ), clamped to 1 to 99
Calculations1,669 individual calculations run on your scan: 1,434 landmark coordinates, pose and expression correction, every geometric term behind the 22 measurement categories, and the calibrated scoring model
Your result83 of 100

Against Facemap scans

YOU 83
050100

Precision Aesthetic Intelligence

02 / 9

Facemap

02. Strongest, weakest, highest leverage

The story behind the number.

Your strongest feature

97/100

Gonial angle

Reading122.1 degrees
Target126 degrees

The feature your scan rated highest. Lead with it: styling, lighting and angles that frame it do the most work for you.

Your weakest feature

63/100

Eye aspect ratio

Reading0.45
Target0.33

The measurement pulling your overall score down hardest. Not a flaw, a target.

Your highest-leverage area

64/100

Eye size symmetry

Reading-0.19
Target0, identical openness

Not your weakest, but the reading closest to its harmonious target. The smallest shift here lifts your overall score the most, and styling, lighting and camera angle can supply that shift.

Precision Aesthetic Intelligence

03 / 9

Facemap

03. Face shape

Classification

Your face shape is Heart.

Calculationforehead width, bizygomatic width and jaw width compared against face height, then matched to the nearest of five reference outlines
Landmarks10, 152, 234, 454, 172, 397, 103, 332
Your patternjaw width below 0.85 of forehead width, chin point narrow

A wider forehead and cheekbones tapering to a narrower chin. Styles that add weight at the jaw and soften the brow line balance the taper.

Often referenced: Scarlett Johansson, Chris Hemsworth.

The five reference outlines

Oval

31%

Oblong

14%

Heart

18%

Square

21%

Round

16%

Percentages show how often each outline occurs across the Facemap scans. Yours is Heart, 18% of scans.

Hair and brows

Cuts, partings and brow shapes that balance your widest and narrowest points.

Frames and necklines

Glasses and collar shapes that either contrast or echo your outline.

Photo angles

The turn and tilt that read best for your shape on camera.

Precision Aesthetic Intelligence

04 / 9

Facemap

04. Symmetry, best side and Selfie Blueprint

Left versus right, region by region.

Eyes and brows
0.3% deviation
Cheekbones
0.4% deviation
Nose
0.4% deviation
Lips
0.5% deviation
Jawline
0.6% deviation

Deviation = mirrored landmark distance / face width, per region.

Your best side

The right side leads by 3.2%.

Your right side carries marginally tighter symmetry through the cheek and jaw. Favouring it by a few degrees in photographs will read fractionally stronger.

Your Selfie Blueprint

  • Chin level, lens at eye height keeps your proportions truest.
  • Turn the face left by 5 to 8 degrees so your right side leads.
  • Key light at 45 degrees, slightly above eye line, opens the midface and models the cheekbones.
  • Shoot from roughly an arm and a half away and crop in, rather than close up. Distance under 40cm widens your nose and shortens your midface reading.
  • Place your eye line about a third down the frame, with a little space above the head. Your heart outline reads best when the widest point of your face is not pressed against the frame edge.
  • A closed, slightly lifted smile holds your lip ratio and canthal tilt closest to their measured values. A wide open smile flattens the tilt and shortens the lower third.

Precision Aesthetic Intelligence

05 / 9

Facemap

05. Youth Signature

Youth balance 70/100

Your geometry leans strongly towards the proportions associated with a youthful read. Most of your youth markers are already working for you. Facemap does not estimate your age. This section reads the ten measurements that research links to a youthful or a more mature impression, and tells you which side each of yours falls.

Reading youthful

  • Jawline definition

    96/100

    A defined jaw border keeps the lower face crisp and youthful in outline.

  • Chin to philtrum

    95/100

    A short philtrum against the chin is strongly linked to a youthful lower face.

  • Midface ratio

    94/100

    A compact midface keeps the centre of the face reading fresh and lifted.

  • Nasal index

    93/100

    Nasal proportions sit within the range that keeps the midface balanced.

  • Facial thirds

    91/100

    Evenly balanced thirds hold the face in proportions associated with youth.

  • fWHR

    89/100

    Your width-to-height ratio keeps the face compact rather than elongated.

  • Lip fullness

    85/100

    Fuller lip volume relative to face height is a classic youth marker.

Adding maturity

  • Eye aspect ratio

    63/100

    A narrower aperture reads calmer and more mature.

  • Eye to brow distance

    65/100

    A lower brow-to-eye distance closes the frame and reads more mature.

  • Canthal tilt

    67/100

    A flatter or negative tilt reads as a more settled, mature eye line.

Precision Aesthetic Intelligence

06 / 9

Facemap

06. Facial proportion ranking

Your readings, ranked.

Every measurement is matched against its published reference range. The readings at the top sit closest to the middle of that range; the ones further down are where your proportions move furthest from it, or shift most with styling and angle.

  1. 01Gonial angle97/100
  2. 02Jawline definition96/100
  3. 03Chin to philtrum95/100
  4. 04Midface ratio94/100
  5. 05Nasal index93/100
  6. 06Mouth to nose width93/100
  7. 07Lip ratio92/100
  8. 08Facial thirds91/100
  9. 09Facial fifths90/100
  10. 10fWHR89/100

Precision Aesthetic Intelligence

07 / 9

Facemap

07. Your annotated scan

Annotated Facemap facial scan with contour and landmark overlay

478 landmarks

Your own photograph, mapped.

Your report overlays the full 478-landmark mesh and contour field on your captured frame, with each of the 22 measurement zones labelled. Yours to keep, and to compare against every future re-scan.

Precision Aesthetic Intelligence

07 / 9

Facemap

08. Your Personal Style Compass

A heart face, styled to its geometry.

Every recommendation below is drawn from your measured geometry and from the published styling literature on face shape, proportion and framing. Nothing here is AI generated, nothing here is medical advice, and none of it asks you to change your anatomy. These are the levers that change how your existing geometry reads.

01

Hair and fringe

Hair is the single largest lever you have, because it changes the outline used in almost every proportional measurement. These are the shapes that suit a heart outline.

What suits you

Weight and movement at the jaw: chin-length bobs, lobs with soft ends, and side-swept fringes that reduce apparent forehead width.

Face shape: Heart.

What to be careful with

Very short pixies with all volume at the crown, and slicked-back styles that expose the full forehead width against a narrow chin.

Face shape: Heart.

Parting

A deep side parting balances the wider upper third.

Derived from your symmetry and facial thirds readings.

02

Brows, skin and emphasis

Grooming levers are small in effort and disproportionately large in effect, because they act directly on the landmarks the scan measures.

Brow architecture

Set the arch peak above the outer edge of the iris, groom the underside rather than thinning the top edge, and keep the tail no lower than the head of the brow. This one change moves brow symmetry, brow-to-eye distance and canthal tilt readings at the same time.

Brow position feeds three of your 22 measurements.

Skin surface and light return

Even tone and a satin, not matte and not glossy, finish let the light model your cheekbones. Heavy matte finishes flatten the midface and remove the shadow that defines the jaw border.

Surface finish changes how strongly your contour reads under any light.

Placement of emphasis

Emphasis high on the cheekbone shortens the midface read. Emphasis low widens and lengthens it. Choose according to your midface ratio score.

Derived from your midface ratio and cheekbone geometry.

03

Eyewear and frames

Frames sit across your strongest horizontal line, so shape and depth matter more than colour.

Frame guidance

Bottom-heavy or rimless-bottom frames add visual weight low in the face. Light colours and thin temples keep the upper third from widening. Avoid heavy top bars and cat-eye shapes.

Face shape: Heart.

Frame width

Keep the outer edge of the frame level with the widest point of your face. Wider frames add facial width, narrower frames make the face read longer.

Derived from your facial width-to-height ratio.

04

Necklines and collars

What sits under the jaw sets the frame the whole face is read against.

What to wear at the neck

Sweetheart and scoop necklines echo the taper; adding a collar or a soft scarf gives the jaw more visual weight.

Face shape: Heart.

05

Your five highest-leverage adjustments

Ranked from your own lowest readings. None of these change your anatomy; each changes how a specific measured reading is perceived.

Eye aspect ratio

Lash and lid definition and a rested, unsquinted expression open the aperture. Under-eye brightness increases the apparent opening more than lash volume does.

Scored 63 of 100, one of your lowest readings.

Eye size symmetry

Uneven eye aperture is usually driven by lid position and habitual squint on one side. Even, straight-on lighting reduces the apparent difference more than anything cosmetic.

Scored 64 of 100, one of your lowest readings.

Eye to brow distance

Brow height is one of the most adjustable readings you have. Grooming the underside of the brow rather than the top edge raises the apparent lid space; letting the brow grow low closes it.

Scored 65 of 100, one of your lowest readings.

Interpupillary distance

Fixed anatomy. Frame width and brow spacing are the levers that change how it reads, not the measurement itself.

Scored 65 of 100, one of your lowest readings.

Eye spacing

Emphasis placed on the inner or outer corner shifts perceived spacing: inner-corner brightening pulls close-set eyes apart visually, outer-corner emphasis draws wide-set eyes together.

Scored 66 of 100, one of your lowest readings.

06

What to lean into

Your strongest readings. Style to show these, not to hide them.

Gonial angle

Measured values commonly sit in a broad band around 120 degrees, with a strong sex and ancestry component. A surface scan estimates soft-tissue geometry, not bone, so treat it as an index rather than a clinical figure.

Scored 97 of 100.

Jawline definition

There is no universal target, since jaw structure varies widely and is strongly influenced by bone shape, muscle mass and soft tissue thickness. A narrower jaw-to-cheek ratio tends to read as a tapered, heart-shaped lower face, while a ratio closer to one reads as a squarer lower face. Sharper contour scores generally correspond to a more visually defined jaw edge under any lighting.

Scored 96 of 100.

Chin to philtrum

A commonly referenced target is a philtrum to chin ratio near 1:2, though considerable natural variation exists across bone structure and lip fullness. The reading is descriptive, not a target to chase, and works best alongside the wider facial thirds breakdown.

Scored 95 of 100.

Precision Aesthetic Intelligence

08 / 9

Facemap

09. All 22 geometric measurements

Every measurement: the calculation, the reading, the score.

Each entry shows exactly how the number was produced, what your scan recorded, how that scores from 1 to 100, and what it means in plain English.

score = round( 100 x exp( -0.5 x ( (reading - target) / tolerance )^2 ) ), clamped to 1 to 99

01

Eyes and brows

MeasuresAngle of the inner-to-outer eye corner axis, averaged left and right
Calculationmean( atan2( y(inner) - y(outer), |x(outer) - x(inner)| ) ) in degrees
Landmarks33, 133 (left), 263, 362 (right)
Your reading-0.26 degrees
Target6 degrees positive tilt
Tolerance7 degrees
Score67 of 100
Percentile bandAbove average, higher than roughly 71% of rated faces

Most faces measure between roughly neutral and a few degrees positive. Larger positive angles read as alert and lifted, negative angles read as soft and downturned, and neither is a fault. Your reading is developing. This reading sits outside the harmonious reference band and is one of the places your overall score loses ground. The action plan shows the levers that move it.

MeasuresIntercanthal width expressed in eye widths
Calculationdist(133, 362) / mean( dist(33, 133), dist(263, 362) )
Landmarks33, 133, 263, 362
Your reading1.20
Target1.00, the one-eye-apart rule
Tolerance0.22
Score66 of 100
Percentile bandAbove average, higher than roughly 70% of rated faces

A ratio near one matches the classical one-eye-width reference. Wider and narrower spacing are both common and both read as distinctive rather than incorrect. Your reading is developing. This reading sits outside the harmonious reference band and is one of the places your overall score loses ground. The action plan shows the levers that move it.

MeasuresVertical brow clearance, normalised to eye width
Calculationmean( |y(105) - y(159)|, |y(334) - y(386)| ) / eye width
Landmarks105, 159, 334, 386
Your reading0.88
Target0.60 eye widths
Tolerance0.30
Score65 of 100
Percentile bandAbove average, higher than roughly 68% of rated faces

There is no single correct gap. A smaller ratio is typical of hooded or deep-set eyes, where the brow sits close to the lid, and a larger ratio is typical of an open eyelid with more visible lid space. Both are common structural variants rather than a defect. Your reading is developing. This reading sits outside the harmonious reference band and is one of the places your overall score loses ground. The action plan shows the levers that move it.

MeasuresPupil separation as a fraction of your own bizygomatic width
Calculationdist(468, 473) / dist(234, 454)
Landmarks468, 473 (iris centres), 234, 454
Your reading0.53
Target0.46
Tolerance0.08
Score65 of 100
Percentile bandAbove average, higher than roughly 68% of rated faces

Adult interpupillary distance typically falls between 54 and 68 millimetres, with the average sitting close to 63 millimetres. There is no better or worse value, it is simply a fixed structural measurement used mainly for practical fitting purposes. Your reading is developing. This reading sits outside the harmonious reference band and is one of the places your overall score loses ground. The action plan shows the levers that move it.

MeasuresDifference in aperture openness between the two eyes
Calculation|EAR(left) - EAR(right)| / mean EAR, where EAR = eye height / eye width
Landmarks33, 133, 145, 159 and 263, 362, 374, 386
Your reading-0.19
Target0, identical openness
Tolerance0.20
Score64 of 100
Percentile bandAbove average, higher than roughly 66% of rated faces

A small difference between the two eyes is near universal and is rarely noticeable in daily life. The reading is most useful as a description of your own structure, not as a comparison against anyone else's face. Your reading is developing. This reading sits outside the harmonious reference band and is one of the places your overall score loses ground. The action plan shows the levers that move it.

MeasuresEye openness, palpebral height against width
Calculationmean( dist(159, 145) / dist(33, 133), dist(386, 374) / dist(263, 362) )
Landmarks33, 133, 145, 159, 263, 362, 374, 386
Your reading0.45
Target0.33
Tolerance0.12
Score63 of 100
Percentile bandAbove average, higher than roughly 64% of rated faces

There is no single correct eye aspect ratio, shape is a description rather than a score. Almond, round and narrow shapes each fall within recognised ranges, and the reading is most useful for understanding your own baseline shape rather than comparing against another face. Your reading is developing. This reading sits outside the harmonious reference band and is one of the places your overall score loses ground. The action plan shows the levers that move it.

02

Jaw and chin

MeasuresInterior angle at the jaw corner
Calculationangle at 172 between 234 and 152, mirrored at 397, then averaged
Landmarks234, 172, 152 and 454, 397, 152
Your reading122.1 degrees
Target126 degrees
Tolerance16 degrees
Score97 of 100
Percentile bandExceptional, higher than roughly 99% of rated faces

Measured values commonly sit in a broad band around 120 degrees, with a strong sex and ancestry component. A surface scan estimates soft-tissue geometry, not bone, so treat it as an index rather than a clinical figure. Your reading is exceptional. This is one of the standout readings in your scan, sitting well inside the range our reference data associates with high harmony.

MeasuresBigonial width against bizygomatic width, the cheek-to-jaw taper
Calculationdist(172, 397) / dist(234, 454)
Landmarks172, 397, 234, 454
Your reading0.76
Target0.72
Tolerance0.15
Score96 of 100
Percentile bandExceptional, higher than roughly 99% of rated faces

There is no universal target, since jaw structure varies widely and is strongly influenced by bone shape, muscle mass and soft tissue thickness. A narrower jaw-to-cheek ratio tends to read as a tapered, heart-shaped lower face, while a ratio closer to one reads as a squarer lower face. Sharper contour scores generally correspond to a more visually defined jaw edge under any lighting. Your reading is exceptional. This is one of the standout readings in your scan, sitting well inside the range our reference data associates with high harmony.

MeasuresChin height against philtrum length
Calculation|y(152) - y(17)| / |y(0) - y(2)|
Landmarks152, 17, 0, 2
Your reading1.93
Target2.20
Tolerance0.85
Score95 of 100
Percentile bandExceptional, higher than roughly 99% of rated faces

A commonly referenced target is a philtrum to chin ratio near 1:2, though considerable natural variation exists across bone structure and lip fullness. The reading is descriptive, not a target to chase, and works best alongside the wider facial thirds breakdown. Your reading is exceptional. This is one of the standout readings in your scan, sitting well inside the range our reference data associates with high harmony.

03

Nose, lips and midface

MeasuresPupil line to upper lip distance, in interpupillary units
Calculation|y(pupil midpoint) - y(13)| / dist(468, 473)
Landmarks468, 473, 13
Your reading1.07
Target1.00
Tolerance0.20
Score94 of 100
Percentile bandExceptional, higher than roughly 99% of rated faces

Lower ratios read as compact, higher ratios read as elongated. Both are common, and the full report plots your figure against the Facemap reference set. Your reading is exceptional. This is one of the standout readings in your scan, sitting well inside the range our reference data associates with high harmony.

MeasuresNose width against nose height
Calculationdist(129, 358) / dist(168, 2)
Landmarks129, 358, 168, 2
Your reading0.67
Target0.75
Tolerance0.20
Score93 of 100
Percentile bandExceptional, higher than roughly 99% of rated faces

Nasal index varies meaningfully and consistently across ancestry, so there is no single universal reference range. Facemap reports the measured value and its relationship to face width rather than scoring it against one fixed reference point. Your reading is exceptional. This is one of the standout readings in your scan, sitting well inside the range our reference data associates with high harmony.

MeasuresMouth width against alar base width
Calculationdist(61, 291) / dist(129, 358)
Landmarks61, 291, 129, 358
Your reading1.43
Target1.55
Tolerance0.32
Score93 of 100
Percentile bandExceptional, higher than roughly 99% of rated faces

The classical reference figure sits close to 1.618, the proportional balance, though measured faces show a wide spread around this figure and no single value indicates better or worse structure. The ratio is most useful as a stable, repeatable reading rather than a score to optimise. Your reading is exceptional. This is one of the standout readings in your scan, sitting well inside the range our reference data associates with high harmony.

Lip ratio92/100
MeasuresLower vermilion height against upper vermilion height
Calculation|y(17) - y(14)| / |y(13) - y(0)|
Landmarks0, 13, 14, 17
Your reading1.87
Target1.60
Tolerance0.65
Score92 of 100
Percentile bandExceptional, higher than roughly 99% of rated faces

Classical references cite roughly one to one and a half, upper to lower. Measured faces spread widely on either side of that. Your reading is exceptional. This is one of the standout readings in your scan, sitting well inside the range our reference data associates with high harmony.

04

Proportion and ratio

MeasuresEvenness of the three vertical thirds
Calculationstandard deviation of the three thirds / their mean
Landmarks10, 9, 2, 152
Your reading0.10
Target0, perfectly even thirds
Tolerance0.22
Score91 of 100
Percentile bandExceptional, higher than roughly 99% of rated faces

Evenly distributed thirds are a classical reference point, not a requirement. A longer lower third, for example, is a common and often striking structural signature. Your reading is exceptional. This is one of the standout readings in your scan, sitting well inside the range our reference data associates with high harmony.

MeasuresEvenness of the five vertical columns across face width
Calculationstandard deviation of the five columns / their mean
Landmarks234, 33, 133, 362, 263, 454
Your reading0.18
Target0, five equal columns
Tolerance0.40
Score90 of 100
Percentile bandExceptional, higher than roughly 99% of rated faces

An even five-way split is the reference point, but most measured faces show one or two columns running slightly wider or narrower, usually the outer columns nearest the ear. That variation is normal and rarely visible without measurement. Your reading is exceptional. This is one of the standout readings in your scan, sitting well inside the range our reference data associates with high harmony.

fWHR89/100
MeasuresFacial width-to-height ratio
Calculationdist(234, 454) / |y(13) - y(9)|
Landmarks234, 454, 9, 13
Your reading1.70
Target1.90
Tolerance0.42
Score89 of 100
Percentile bandOutstanding, higher than roughly 99% of rated faces

Reported averages across studies typically sit between 1.6 and 2.1, with meaningful overlap between individuals. A higher fWHR is not inherently more or less typical, it simply describes a wider face relative to its upper height. Your reading is exceptional. This is one of the standout readings in your scan, sitting well inside the range our reference data associates with high harmony.

MeasuresComposite of length-to-width and cheek-to-jaw taper
Calculation0.6 x (face height / face width) + 0.9 x (bigonial / bizygomatic)
Landmarks10, 152, 234, 454, 172, 397
Your reading1.70
Target1.55, a balanced oval
Tolerance0.30
Score88 of 100
Percentile bandOutstanding, higher than roughly 99% of rated faces

No shape is more correct than another, and the classification is descriptive rather than evaluative. Oval, round, square, heart, diamond and oblong all occur naturally and in roughly comparable frequency across populations. Your reading is exceptional. This is one of the standout readings in your scan, sitting well inside the range our reference data associates with high harmony.

05

Symmetry

MeasuresMean mirrored-pair residual across the whole face
Calculationmidline fitted from 24 mirrored midpoints, head turn removed by regressing the left-right offset difference on landmark depth, then mean hypot(lateral residual, vertical residual) / face width
Landmarks24 mirrored pairs spanning eyes, brows, cheeks, nose, mouth and jaw
Your reading-0.03
Target0
Tolerance0.055
Score87 of 100
Percentile bandOutstanding, higher than roughly 98% of rated faces

No face is perfectly symmetrical, and near-perfect symmetry reads as uncanny rather than attractive. Most measured faces fall within a narrow band of small deviations, and the useful signal is which region carries the difference, not the headline number. Your reading is strong. A strong reading, comfortably inside the harmonious reference band and a genuine asset to your overall score.

MeasuresMirrored-pair residual across the brow region only
Calculationsame residual as facial symmetry, restricted to the brow pairs
Landmarks105/334, 70/300, 46/276, 107/336, 66/296
Your reading0.03
Target0
Tolerance0.055
Score86 of 100
Percentile bandOutstanding, higher than roughly 98% of rated faces

Small brow height and arch differences of a few millimetres are extremely common and usually not visible in a mirror. Larger differences, particularly in arch peak position, are more likely to be noticeable and are the most common source of a perceived uneven brow. Your reading is strong. A strong reading, comfortably inside the harmonious reference band and a genuine asset to your overall score.

MeasuresMirrored-pair residual across the mouth region only
Calculationsame residual as facial symmetry, restricted to the lip pairs
Landmarks61/291, 40/270, 91/321, 39/269, 185/409
Your reading-0.03
Target0
Tolerance0.050
Score86 of 100
Percentile bandOutstanding, higher than roughly 98% of rated faces

A small difference in mouth corner height is normal and often relates to habitual expression on one side of the face. The reading is most informative as three separate figures rather than a single combined score, since each one can vary independently. Your reading is strong. A strong reading, comfortably inside the harmonious reference band and a genuine asset to your overall score.

MeasuresCombined vermilion height against mouth width
Calculation|y(17) - y(0)| / dist(61, 291)
Landmarks0, 17, 61, 291
Your reading0.54
Target0.45
Tolerance0.16
Score85 of 100
Percentile bandOutstanding, higher than roughly 98% of rated faces

There is a wide range of lip proportions across faces that are considered balanced, and fullness reads differently depending on mouth width and the ratio between upper and lower lip. The figure is descriptive rather than a target to aim for. Your reading is strong. A strong reading, comfortably inside the harmonious reference band and a genuine asset to your overall score.

Precision Aesthetic Intelligence

09 / 9

Sample report shown with demonstration data. Your report is generated from your own scan, delivered as a downloadable PDF, and covered by a 7-day money-back guarantee. Photographs from free scans are never uploaded or stored; they are cleared from your browser when you leave the page and are never sold or used for AI training. Read the full scoring methodology.

Start your free scan